Britse belastingbetalers moesten tot 2015 dokken om slavenhouders te compenseren voor het verlies van hun menselijke eigendommen
On 3 August 1835, somewhere in the City of London, two of Europe’s most famous bankers came to an agreement with the chancellor of the exchequer. Two years earlier, the British government had passed the Slavery Abolition Act, which outlawed slavery in most parts of the empire. Now it was taking out one of the largest loans in history, to finance the slave compensation package required by the 1833 act. Nathan Mayer Rothschild and his brother-in-law Moses Montefiore agreed to loan the British government £15m, with the government adding an additional £5m later. The total sum represented 40% of the government’s yearly income in those days, equivalent to some £300bn today. You might expect this so-called “slave compensation” to have gone to the freed slaves to redress the injustices they suffered. Instead, the money went exclusively to the owners of slaves, who were being compensated for the loss of what had, until then, been considered their property. Not a single shilling of reparation, nor a single word of apology, has ever been granted by the British state to the people it enslaved, or their descendants. Today, 1835 feels so long ago; so far away. But if you are a British taxpayer, what happened in that quiet room affects you directly. Your taxes were used to pay off the loan, and the payments only ended in 2015. Generations of Britons have been implicated in a legacy of financial support for one of the world’s most egregious crimes against humanity. The fact that you, and your parents, and their parents in turn, may have been paying for a huge slave-owner compensation package from the 1830s only came to public attention last month. The revelation came on 9 February, in the form of a tweet by HM Treasury: “Here’s today’s surprising #FridayFact. Millions of you have helped end the slave trade through your taxes. Did you know? In 1833, Britain used £20 million, 40% of its national budget, to buy freedom for all slaves in the Empire. The amount of money borrowed for the Slavery Abolition Act was so large that it wasn’t paid off until 2015. Which means that living British citizens helped pay to end the slave trade.” The tweet, which the Treasury says was prompted by a Freedom of Information Act request submitted in January, generated a storm of anger and crowdsourced corrections. First, the British slave trade was not abolished in 1833, but in 1807. Second, slavery was not abolished in all parts of the British empire in 1833. The new law applied to the British Caribbean islands, Mauritius and the Cape Colony, in today’s South Africa, but not to Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) or British India, for instance. Third, no freedom was “bought” for plantation slaves in 1833, as the enslaved were compelled to work in unfreedom, without pay and under the constant threat of punishment, until 1838. Most importantly, the Treasury’s tweet did not mention that generations of British taxpayers had been paying off a loan that had been used to compensate slave owners, rather than slaves.
Kris Manjapra in When will Britain face up to its crimes against humanity? (Guardian)
Verbijstererend maar je had het zelf kunnen bedenken dat er zo iets als dergelijke afbetalings regeling was. Immers een groot deel vd grond in de U.K. is nog steeds in eigendom van adelijken. Als ik me niet vergis. Wat ik daar mee wil zeggen is dat de elite in de U.K. hun giga landgoederen hebben gebouwd op inkomsten uit slavenarbeid . Als je nog geen adelijke titel had dan kreeg je die wel. Het was dus volgens mij een onderonsje van de ” elite ” korte lijntjes die ” afschaffing ” . Zo als het dat nog steeds in hoge mate is ook in Nederland. Korte lijntjes gewoon even bellen met de Staats secretaris des noods met de minister door een industrieel als die het wat te moeilijk krijgt door ijverige ambtenaren.
Daar bij idd het verhaal van afro amerikanen dat die door veroordelingen voor futiliteiten of zonder ooit wat te hebben misdaan via de gevangenis opnieuw in de dwangarbeid kwamen. Tegenwoordig niet alleen afro amerikanen in de VS hoe wel die een groot deel vd gevangenis bevolking uitmaken. Private gevangenissen die bedrijven zijn in meerdere opzichten . Mijn bronnen ? Niet moeilijk te vinden bijv. :
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2014/08/14/slavery-legal-exception-prisoners-drugs-reform-column/14086227/
” Ratified at the end of the Civil War, the amendment abolished slavery, with one critical exception: Slavery and involuntary servitude actually remain lawful “as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted.” In other words, according to this so-called punishment clause, if you get pulled over with the wrong controlled substance in your trunk, there’s nothing in the 13th Amendment to ensure you can’t be considered a slave of the state. ” Daar bij je kent ook wel de beelden uit films vd “chain gang ” die lekker goedkoop want vrijwel gratis
de openbare weg onderhouden plantsoenen enzv. daar bij moet het nog even worden ingewreven dat ze nog niet eens tweede rangs zijn door ze belachelijke pakjes te laten aantrekken.
Daar bij moet ik dan ook aan me zelf denken. Wat hangt mij nog aan dwangarbeid boven het hoofd als Bijstander in Nederland ?